Client 1
Client 2
Client 3
Client 4
Client 5

Trusted by 200+ businesses

Mobile App Development

We build iOS and Android applications, using native or cross-platform technology depending on what the product actually requires. Some apps genuinely need platform-specific capabilities; many do not, and paying for two codebases in those cases is a waste. We are explicit about which situation you are in.

Google — Zeisoft partneri
Meta Business — Zeisoft partneri
ikas — Zeisoft partneri
Platin360 — Zeisoft partneri
IdeaSoft — Zeisoft partneri
Sentos — Zeisoft partneri

Fill the Form

Average response time: 4 hours
Choosing between native and cross-platform development

Native or cross-platform, decided on evidence

Cross-platform frameworks cover the majority of business applications well, at roughly half the build and maintenance cost of two native codebases. Native becomes the right answer when the app depends heavily on device capabilities, demands sustained high performance, or needs platform features the moment they ship. We assess which applies before committing.

Requirement-driven technology choice

Realistic maintenance cost comparison

Shared backend with your web platform

Store submission and release handling

Mobile app maintenance and release cycle

An app is a commitment, not a delivery

Unlike a website, an app keeps needing attention after launch: operating system updates, store policy changes, device compatibility. A project plan that ends at release is incomplete. We plan for the maintenance period from the start and say what it will involve.

Release and update pipeline

OS version compatibility upkeep

Crash monitoring and diagnostics

Source code handed over in full

Deciding whether to build

The first useful conversation is not about technology. It is about whether an application is the right response to the problem at all.

Apps carry ongoing cost that websites do not — store compliance, OS updates, device fragmentation — and they start with an install barrier that removes most casual users. When usage is frequent, when the device itself matters, or when the audience is a defined group with a reason to install, that cost is justified. When the goal is reaching occasional visitors, it usually is not.

How we build

Scope and technology. What the app must do, and which approach fits it — including the maintenance cost of each option.

Staged delivery. A working version early, so assumptions get tested against something real rather than a document.

Release. Store submission, review handling and the release pipeline.

Handover. Source code, accounts and documentation transferred to you. Related work sits under custom software development.

Considering an app?

Tell us what it should do and we will work out whether an app is the right answer.

Fill the Form

Average response time: 4 hours

Frequently Asked Questions About Mobile Apps

Browse our frequently asked questions to find the best solution for your business

Often not. If the goal is reaching customers who visit occasionally, a fast mobile website usually performs better — there is no install barrier. Apps earn their cost when usage is frequent and habitual, when device capabilities are genuinely required, or when the audience is a defined group such as staff or dealers. We give an honest answer on this even when it costs us the project.
Yes, and it usually should. A shared backend means one source of truth for products, orders or users instead of two systems drifting apart. Where a web platform already exists, we build against it rather than duplicating the logic.
A focused application with a well-defined scope typically takes three to five months from start to store. Broader products with multiple user roles and existing systems to integrate take longer. Store review adds time at the end, and that timing is not fully within anyone's control.
You do. Source code, store accounts and signing credentials are yours and are handed over in full. Apps published under an agency's account create a serious dependency, and we do not work that way.